Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gadomski v. Patelco Credit Union, 2:17-cv-00695-TLN-AC. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170703832 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2017
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER New Response TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Per agreement of the Parties on June 27, 2017, and pursuant to Local Rule 144, the undersigned counsel HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE and JOINTLY MOVE the Court to extend Defendant PATELCO CREDIT UNION's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action by twenty one (21) days to July 18, 2017. The Parties previously stipulated to extend Patelco
More

SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND ORDER New Response

Per agreement of the Parties on June 27, 2017, and pursuant to Local Rule 144, the undersigned counsel HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE and JOINTLY MOVE the Court to extend Defendant PATELCO CREDIT UNION's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action by twenty one (21) days to July 18, 2017.

The Parties previously stipulated to extend Patelco's deadline to respond to the Complaint by twenty eight (28) days.

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Parties' Second Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, hereby extends Patelco Credit Union's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to July 18, 2017.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer