Jones v. City of Sacramento, 2:17-cv-02046-WBS-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190429b15
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND FOR DISMISSAL OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any of the claims set forth in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Docket 11) and therefore, Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs, fee
Summary: ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND FOR DISMISSAL OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any of the claims set forth in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Docket 11) and therefore, Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs, fees..
More
ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND FOR DISMISSAL OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any of the claims set forth in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Docket 11) and therefore, Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs, fees and litigation expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
