Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

C & J, Inc. v. Sysco Corporation, 3:17-cv-06553-RS. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180306b24 Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiffs C & J, Inc. d/b/a Armadillo's Restaurant and Mario's Ristorante Italiano and Defendants Sysco Corporation and Sysco San Francisco, Inc. (collectively "Sysco") (together, the "parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows, and request the Court approve their stipulation for good cause shown: WHE
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs C & J, Inc. d/b/a Armadillo's Restaurant and Mario's Ristorante Italiano and Defendants Sysco Corporation and Sysco San Francisco, Inc. (collectively "Sysco") (together, the "parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows, and request the Court approve their stipulation for good cause shown:

WHEREAS, Sysco filed a motion to dismiss on February 16, 2018 (Dkt. No. 18) with Plaintiffs' response due on March 2, 2018, Sysco's reply due on March 9, 2018 and a hearing date of April 12, 2018;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel has spoken to counsel for Sysco and Sysco has agreed that Plaintiffs could file their response to the motion to dismiss by March 16, 2018;

WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and convenience of the Court and the parties, the parties wish to coordinate the briefing schedule and hearing date on Sysco's motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS, the parties therefore stipulate and agree to the following briefing schedule and hearing date for Sysco's motion to dismiss:

Plaintiff's Opposition to Sysco's motion: March 16, 2018 Due date for Replies: March 30, 2018 Hearing on Sysco's motion: April 26, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.

WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request, for good cause shown, that the Court approve the above schedule for the briefing and hearing on Sysco's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

I, Lawrence G. Papale, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Joint Case Management Conference Statement. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Mark Riera, counsel for Defendants has concurred in this filing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer