Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Gilmore, 2:13-CR-0300-GEB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170504a63 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 02, 2017
Latest Update: May 02, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney, through Gregory T. Broderick, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather E. Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defenders Sean Riordan and Matthew C. Bockmon, attorneys for Russell E. Gilmore, that the Trial Confirmation Hearing scheduled for May
More

STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney, through Gregory T. Broderick, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather E. Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defenders Sean Riordan and Matthew C. Bockmon, attorneys for Russell E. Gilmore, that the Trial Confirmation Hearing scheduled for May 5, 2017 be continued to May 12, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Defendant Richard Hemsley is not a party to this stipulation as he is currently a fugitive with an outstanding warrant issued by Magistrate Judge Delaney on April 5, 2017. See Dkt. Nos. 298-300. The United States e-mailed Mr. Hemlsey on May 2, 2017, in an attempt to ascertain his position. He responded by email as follows: "I can make the adjustment to my calendar."

The continuance is appropriate because both the United States and the defense need time to evaluate the effect of defendants' recent appeal to the Ninth Circuit from this Court's order denying the defense's request for a preliminary injunction based on the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. McIntosh, 833 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2016). (Dkt. No. 290).

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from this order's date through and including May 12, 2017, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(C) [delay resulting from interlocutory appeals], Local Code D, as well as 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare and continuity of counsel] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

The Court having received, read, and considered the stipulation between the United States of America and defendant Russell Gilmore, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation in its entirety as its Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer