Jarrell v. Valenza, 1:16-CV-188-ECM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180918886
Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On August 17, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 27) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff.
Summary: ORDER EMILY C. MARKS , District Judge . On August 17, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 27) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants. 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff. ..
More
ORDER
EMILY C. MARKS, District Judge.
On August 17, 2018, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. # 27) to which no objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendants.
4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
5. Costs are taxed against the plaintiff.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
Source: Leagle
