U.S. v. Denton, 4:16CR00072 JLH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180312710
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL — QUINSHOD KAYLA SHAW J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . On the 6th day of March, 2018, this case came before the Court for trial by jury. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorneys Patrick C. Harris and Erin S. O'Leary. Darris Dewayne Denton appeared in person and with his attorney, Nicki Nicolo; and Quinshod Kayla Shaw appeared in person and with his attorney Steven R. Davis. The parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve and one alt
Summary: JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL — QUINSHOD KAYLA SHAW J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . On the 6th day of March, 2018, this case came before the Court for trial by jury. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorneys Patrick C. Harris and Erin S. O'Leary. Darris Dewayne Denton appeared in person and with his attorney, Nicki Nicolo; and Quinshod Kayla Shaw appeared in person and with his attorney Steven R. Davis. The parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve and one alte..
More
JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL — QUINSHOD KAYLA SHAW
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
On the 6th day of March, 2018, this case came before the Court for trial by jury. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorneys Patrick C. Harris and Erin S. O'Leary. Darris Dewayne Denton appeared in person and with his attorney, Nicki Nicolo; and Quinshod Kayla Shaw appeared in person and with his attorney Steven R. Davis. The parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve and one alternate was selected and sworn.
At the conclusion of the evidence on March 8, 2018, the jury retired for deliberations at 1:49 P.M. At 5:45 P.M., the jury returned unanimous verdicts of not guilty as to all counts for defendant Quinshod Kayla Shaw. Judgment of acquittal is therefore entered on counts one, two, and three of the second superseding indictment for defendant Shaw. The second superseding indictment is dismissed with prejudice as to defendant Shaw.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
