ABREAU v. CATE, CIV S-10-1621 JAM CKD P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120518603
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 17, 2012
Latest Update: May 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. 193. On November 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to discovery requests. Defendants have not filed an opposition. The court will order them to show cause why the motion to compel should not be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants have seven days from the entry of this order in which to show cause why the motion to compel (Dock
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. 193. On November 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to discovery requests. Defendants have not filed an opposition. The court will order them to show cause why the motion to compel should not be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants have seven days from the entry of this order in which to show cause why the motion to compel (Docke..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 193. On November 10, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to discovery requests. Defendants have not filed an opposition. The court will order them to show cause why the motion to compel should not be granted.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants have seven days from the entry of this order in which to show cause why the motion to compel (Docket No. 32) should not be granted.
Source: Leagle
