CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff William Rushing ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Williams-Sonoma DTC, Inc., and Williams-Sonoma Advertising, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby respectfully stipulate and jointly request that the Court approve the briefing schedule agreed upon by the parties regarding Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment ("MSJ"), as set forth below.

RECITALS

On April 10, 2018, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with a hearing date of May 16, 2018. Dkt. 119.

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules of the Northern District of California, and the deadlines set forth on CM-ECF, Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' MSJ is due by April 24, 2018, and Defendants' Reply is due by May 1, 2018.

Plaintiff has requested additional time to potentially conduct discovery and respond to Defendants' MSJ. Since that extension would cause the Reply date to conflict with Memorial Day, the parties have agreed upon a briefing schedule which accommodates Plaintiff's request and the Memorial Day holiday, subject to the Court's approval.

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and through their respective counsel, that the briefing schedule on Defendants' MSJ shall be revised as follows:

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SIGNATURE APPROVAL

The filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to this document.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED as modified below.

The briefing schedule on Defendants' MSJ shall be revised as follows:

IT IS SO ORDERED.