CARROLL v. WHITE, 1:12cv-944-WHA (WO). (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20151021604
Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #15), entered on September 29, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner's assertions of actual innocence provide no gateway fo
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #15), entered on September 29, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner's assertions of actual innocence provide no gateway for..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #15), entered on September 29, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby
ORDERED that this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner's assertions of actual innocence provide no gateway for review of his procedurally defaulted claims, and his claims are foreclosed from federal habeas review. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
