Toro v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-01401-BAM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180918a19
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER REGARDING AMENDED STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY (ECF No. 17) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On September 13, 2018, the Court approved the parties' stipulation to continue the deadline for Plaintiff to file her reply to Defendant's opposition. (ECF No. 16.) Following issuance of the Court's order, the parties filed an amended stipulation and indicated that Plaintiff's counsel made an error in the new date provided for filing the reply. Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER REGARDING AMENDED STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY (ECF No. 17) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On September 13, 2018, the Court approved the parties' stipulation to continue the deadline for Plaintiff to file her reply to Defendant's opposition. (ECF No. 16.) Following issuance of the Court's order, the parties filed an amended stipulation and indicated that Plaintiff's counsel made an error in the new date provided for filing the reply. Plaintiff ..
More
ORDER REGARDING AMENDED STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY (ECF No. 17)
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
On September 13, 2018, the Court approved the parties' stipulation to continue the deadline for Plaintiff to file her reply to Defendant's opposition. (ECF No. 16.) Following issuance of the Court's order, the parties filed an amended stipulation and indicated that Plaintiff's counsel made an error in the new date provided for filing the reply. Plaintiff now seeks an extension of time to October 11, 2018, in which to file her reply. (ECF No. 17.)
Having considered the amended stipulation, and cause appearing, the deadline for Plaintiff to file her reply to Defendant's opposition is HEREBY EXTENDED to October 11, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
