Schuman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, 4:16-CV-05544-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180427d91
Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS [Civ. L.R. 6-2] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiffs Peter Schuman and William Coplin (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Microchip Technology, Inc., Atmel Corporation, and Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program (collectively "Defendants") hereby stipulate, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiffs' time to respond to Defendants' co
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS [Civ. L.R. 6-2] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiffs Peter Schuman and William Coplin (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Microchip Technology, Inc., Atmel Corporation, and Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program (collectively "Defendants") hereby stipulate, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiffs' time to respond to Defendants' cou..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS
[Civ. L.R. 6-2]
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Peter Schuman and William Coplin (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Microchip Technology, Inc., Atmel Corporation, and Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program (collectively "Defendants") hereby stipulate, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that Plaintiffs' time to respond to Defendants' counterclaims (Dkts. 59, 60) is extended up to and including May 31, 2018.
ORDEER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
