Brooks v. Hicks, 3:17-cv-55-DPM-JTK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180405738
Visitors: 41
Filed: Apr. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Brooks hasn't responded to the recommendation; his mail is still being returned undelivered. N o 28. Unopposed recommendation, N o 27, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Motion to dismiss, N o 22-1, granted. Brooks's remaining claims will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C.
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Brooks hasn't responded to the recommendation; his mail is still being returned undelivered. N o 28. Unopposed recommendation, N o 27, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Motion to dismiss, N o 22-1, granted. Brooks's remaining claims will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. 1..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
Brooks hasn't responded to the recommendation; his mail is still being returned undelivered. No 28. Unopposed recommendation, No 27, adopted. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Motion to dismiss, No 22-1, granted. Brooks's remaining claims will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
