Tucker v. Cowell, 1:18CV00035 JM/JTR. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190305624
Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Raylina Ramsey's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) is GRANTED, and Mr. Tucker's claims
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Raylina Ramsey's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) is GRANTED, and Mr. Tucker's claims ..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, JR., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Raylina Ramsey's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) is GRANTED, and Mr. Tucker's claims against her are DISMISSED, with prejudice. It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
