NEWTON v. MIXON, 2:13CV00116 JLH/BD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141127441
Visitors: 32
Filed: Nov. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has received a Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation and the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Document #23. Arthur Newton's claims against Cor
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has received a Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation and the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Document #23. Arthur Newton's claims against Cori..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation and the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects.
The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Document #23. Arthur Newton's claims against Corizon are DISMISSED, without prejudice. His claims against defendant Mixon are DISMISSED, with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
