Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Caridad v. Kramer, 2:14-cv-1847 KJM AC P. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181025841 Visitors: 33
Filed: Oct. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner's counsel has filed a status report asserting that third party Kenneth Rosenfeld has failed to fully abide by this court's discovery orders filed September 20, 2018 and October 12, 2018, and that neither Mr. Rosenfeld nor his counsel, Neal Sawyer, have responded to petitioner's email inquiries. Petitioner also asserts that additional discovery is needed based on indications that Mr. Rosenfeld may be currently billing the Sacramento County
More

ORDER

Petitioner's counsel has filed a status report asserting that third party Kenneth Rosenfeld has failed to fully abide by this court's discovery orders filed September 20, 2018 and October 12, 2018, and that neither Mr. Rosenfeld nor his counsel, Neal Sawyer, have responded to petitioner's email inquiries. Petitioner also asserts that additional discovery is needed based on indications that Mr. Rosenfeld may be currently billing the Sacramento County Conflict Criminal Defenders Panel for services to petitioner that are instead self-serving. The court construes the status report as a motion to compel discovery, and sets the following briefing schedule. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's status report filed October 22, 2018, ECF No. 127, is construed as a motion to compel discovery; the Clerk of Court is directed to so designate the matter on the docket.

2. Petitioner's motion seeks: (a) Mr. Rosenfeld's full compliance with this court's discovery orders filed September 20, 2018 and October 12, 2018, see ECF Nos. 123-4, 126; and (b) additional discovery of Mr. Rosenfeld's legal and billing records reflecting his representation of petitioner for the period July 1, 2017 to the present.1

3. Mr. Rosenfeld is directed to file and serve a response to petitioner's motion within fourteen (14) days after the filing date of this order; ideally, this response would demonstrate full compliance with the court's subject orders including a supporting declaration by Mr. Rosenfeld, previously due by October 17, 2018.

4. Petitioner shall, within seven (7) days after service of Mr. Rosenfeld's response, file and serve a reply.

5. Counsel for respondent is requested, but not required, to file a response to these matters within twenty-one (21) days after the filing date of this order.

6. Upon conclusion of briefing, the motion will be submitted on the papers unless the court orders otherwise.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Existing discovery orders compel disclosure of Mr. Rosenfeld's records through June 30, 2017.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer