In re Midland Credit Management, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation, 11-md-2286-MMA (MDD). (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200319841
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING MICHAEL M. ANELLO , Magistrate Judge . Defendants' Motion to Stay [Doc. No. 761] is currently set for hearing on March 23, 2020. The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, and the previously scheduled hearing will be taken off calendar. The Court will issue a written ruling in due course. I
Summary: ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING MICHAEL M. ANELLO , Magistrate Judge . Defendants' Motion to Stay [Doc. No. 761] is currently set for hearing on March 23, 2020. The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, and the previously scheduled hearing will be taken off calendar. The Court will issue a written ruling in due course. IT..
More
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants' Motion to Stay [Doc. No. 761] is currently set for hearing on March 23, 2020. The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, and the previously scheduled hearing will be taken off calendar. The Court will issue a written ruling in due course.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
