Robinson v. Andrews, 2:18-cv-44-DPM-BD. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20181219919
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, N o 70, and overrules Robinson's objections, N o 71. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). As Magistrate Judge Deere noted, the only piece of Robinson's motion that relates to a claim in this lawsuit is his allegation that Brown hasn't "done her job in this matter which is [causing] more harm to [him] on a mental health level." N o 49 at 2. But Robinson hasn't shown that he's
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, N o 70, and overrules Robinson's objections, N o 71. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). As Magistrate Judge Deere noted, the only piece of Robinson's motion that relates to a claim in this lawsuit is his allegation that Brown hasn't "done her job in this matter which is [causing] more harm to [him] on a mental health level." N o 49 at 2. But Robinson hasn't shown that he's ..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, No 70, and overrules Robinson's objections, No 71. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). As Magistrate Judge Deere noted, the only piece of Robinson's motion that relates to a claim in this lawsuit is his allegation that Brown hasn't "done her job in this matter which is [causing] more harm to [him] on a mental health level." No 49 at 2. But Robinson hasn't shown that he's likely to succeed on the merits of his claims or that transferring him to another unit is necessary to prevent irreparable harm resulting from Brown's alleged failings. His motion, No 49, is therefore denied.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
