Berman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, 4:17-cv-01864-HSG. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191231861
Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY EXECUTION OF THE JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL AND APPROVE SUPERSEDEAS BOND HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay Execution of the Judgment Pending Appeal and Approve Supersedeas Bond. For good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Stay Execution of the Judgment Pending Appeal, with the stay effective upon Defendants' posting a supersedeas bond in the amount of $780,076.70, re
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY EXECUTION OF THE JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL AND APPROVE SUPERSEDEAS BOND HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay Execution of the Judgment Pending Appeal and Approve Supersedeas Bond. For good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Stay Execution of the Judgment Pending Appeal, with the stay effective upon Defendants' posting a supersedeas bond in the amount of $780,076.70, ref..
More
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY EXECUTION OF THE JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL AND APPROVE SUPERSEDEAS BOND
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay Execution of the Judgment Pending Appeal and Approve Supersedeas Bond. For good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Stay Execution of the Judgment Pending Appeal, with the stay effective upon Defendants' posting a supersedeas bond in the amount of $780,076.70, reflecting 125% of the judgment entered on October 18, 2019 (Dkt. No. 119). This amount is sufficient to cover the judgment, pre- and post-judgment interest, and any costs at the conclusion of the appeal.
Source: Leagle
