Filed: Sep. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . On the 9th day of September, 2019, this action came before the Court for trial by jury. The plaintiff, Austin Jay Burns, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Mark F. Hampton and Degen Duane Clow. The defendant, Kedrick R. Avery, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Vincent P. France and William C. Bird, III. Both parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve was selected and duly sworn. After all of the evidence had been received and
Summary: JUDGMENT J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . On the 9th day of September, 2019, this action came before the Court for trial by jury. The plaintiff, Austin Jay Burns, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Mark F. Hampton and Degen Duane Clow. The defendant, Kedrick R. Avery, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Vincent P. France and William C. Bird, III. Both parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve was selected and duly sworn. After all of the evidence had been received and ..
More
JUDGMENT
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
On the 9th day of September, 2019, this action came before the Court for trial by jury. The plaintiff, Austin Jay Burns, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Mark F. Hampton and Degen Duane Clow. The defendant, Kedrick R. Avery, appeared in person and with his lawyers, Vincent P. France and William C. Bird, III. Both parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve was selected and duly sworn. After all of the evidence had been received and the jury had been instructed on the law, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant, Kedrick R. Avery. Judgment is therefore entered in favor of Kedrick R. Avery on the claims of Austin Jay Burns. The complaint of Austin Jay Burns is therefore dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
