Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROSH v. INDEED, INC., 5:13-cv-03751-RMW. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140502h86 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 01, 2014
Latest Update: May 01, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ADJUST CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 6-2, and Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Adam Rosh ("Rosh") and Defendant Indeed, Inc. ("Indeed") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court vacate the case management conference in this matter. The parties have reached a settlement in principle, and anticipate filing a motion for settlement approval shortly with the Co
More

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER TO ADJUST CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 6-2, and Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Adam Rosh ("Rosh") and Defendant Indeed, Inc. ("Indeed") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court vacate the case management conference in this matter. The parties have reached a settlement in principle, and anticipate filing a motion for settlement approval shortly with the Court.

WHEREAS, Rosh filed a Class and Collective Action Complaint in this matter on August 13, 2013 (Dkt. No. 1);

WHEREAS, on September 17, 2013, the Court ordered that the parties submit a Joint Case Management Statement by December 6, 2013, and set a Case Management Conference for December 13, 2013 (Dkt. No. 15);

WHEREAS, Indeed filed an Answer to the Class and Collective Action Complaint on October 4, 2013 (Dkt. No. 16);

WHEREAS, the parties agreed in the Stipulation and Order entered by this Court on November 19, 2013, to submit this case to private mediation to be completed by March 31, 2014 (Dkt. No. 19);

WHEREAS, in the joint case management statement submitted on November 26, 2013, the parties agreed to postpone all discovery in this matter until after the conclusion of mediation;

WHEREAS, this Court entered an order continuing the Case Management Conference until April 25, 2014 (Dkt. 22), and subsequently rescheduled the conference for May 2, 2014 (Dkt. 31);

WHEREAS, the parties engaged in private mediation on March 14, 2014 and reached an agreement in principle to settle this case; and

WHEREAS, the parties are working on drafting the final settlement agreement, approval papers, and supporting documentation, and intend to file a joint motion for settlement approval in the near future;

THEREFORE, Plaintiff Rosh and Defendant Indeed, through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the Court vacate the Case Management Conference in this matter in light of the parties' plan to submit a motion for settlement approval. The parties will seek a hearing with this Court to consider the parties' motion for settlement approval.

[] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer