U.S. v. CORNELISON, 5:11-CR-50101-001. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151014726
Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 71) filed in this case on August 28, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 71) is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and Defendant/Movant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 71) filed in this case on August 28, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 71) is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and Defendant/Movant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S...
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge.
Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 71) filed in this case on August 28, 2015, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 71) is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY, and Defendant/Movant's Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 38) is DENIED. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, a request for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
