Valencia v. Greene County Detention Center, 3:18-cv-90-DPM-JJV. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180817766
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de novo review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, N o 13, and overrules Valencia's objections, N o 14 & N o 15. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). If Valencia wants to allege more facts against Crittenden and TurnKey, then he must do so in an amended complaint—not in his objections. Valencia may proceed on his claim against Defendant Huggins. The other claims in his amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. So Order
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de novo review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, N o 13, and overrules Valencia's objections, N o 14 & N o 15. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). If Valencia wants to allege more facts against Crittenden and TurnKey, then he must do so in an amended complaint—not in his objections. Valencia may proceed on his claim against Defendant Huggins. The other claims in his amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. So Ordere..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
On de novo review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, No 13, and overrules Valencia's objections, No 14 & No 15. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). If Valencia wants to allege more facts against Crittenden and TurnKey, then he must do so in an amended complaint—not in his objections. Valencia may proceed on his claim against Defendant Huggins. The other claims in his amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
