Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Rumph, 2:18:CR-00108-TLN. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190307942 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Assistant United States Attorney Justin Lee, attorney for Plaintiff and Federal Defender Heather E. Williams through Assistant Federal Defender Mia Crager, attorney for Thomas Rumph, that the status conference, currently scheduled for March 7, 2019, be vacated and that a motion hearing be set
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Assistant United States Attorney Justin Lee, attorney for Plaintiff and Federal Defender Heather E. Williams through Assistant Federal Defender Mia Crager, attorney for Thomas Rumph, that the status conference, currently scheduled for March 7, 2019, be vacated and that a motion hearing be set for May 2, 2019 at 9:30 a.m.

The parties further stipulate and request the following briefing schedule:

March 28, 2019: Counsel for Mr. Rumph will file a motion to suppress evidence; April 11, 2019: The government will file its opposition to the motion; April 25, 2019: Counsel for Mr. Rumph will file a reply.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including May 2, 2019; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare], General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation, and 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(D)[pending pretrial motion].

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including May 2, 2019, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare], General Order 479, (Local Code T4) and 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(D) [pending pretrial motion]. It is further ordered the March 7, 2019 status conference shall be vacated and a motion hearing shall be set for May 2, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. The parties shall file briefing as follows:

March 28, 2019: Counsel for Mr. Rumph shall file the motion to suppress evidence; April 11, 2019: The government shall file its opposition to the motion; April 25, 2019: Counsel for Mr. Rumph shall file a reply.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer