CONSERVATION CONGRESS v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150708989
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES BY 90 DAYS TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This is an Administrative Procedure Act case challenging the Forest Service's approval of the Bagley Hazard Tree Abatement Project. On January 28, 2015 the Court approved the parties' proposed briefing schedule. (See ECF No. 28). The Defendants filed the Administrative Record on June 8, 2015. (See ECF No. 31). Since June 8, 2015, the parties scheduled a July 30, 2015, meeting to explore settlement op
Summary: STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES BY 90 DAYS TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . This is an Administrative Procedure Act case challenging the Forest Service's approval of the Bagley Hazard Tree Abatement Project. On January 28, 2015 the Court approved the parties' proposed briefing schedule. (See ECF No. 28). The Defendants filed the Administrative Record on June 8, 2015. (See ECF No. 31). Since June 8, 2015, the parties scheduled a July 30, 2015, meeting to explore settlement opp..
More
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES BY 90 DAYS
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This is an Administrative Procedure Act case challenging the Forest Service's approval of the Bagley Hazard Tree Abatement Project. On January 28, 2015 the Court approved the parties' proposed briefing schedule. (See ECF No. 28). The Defendants filed the Administrative Record on June 8, 2015. (See ECF No. 31). Since June 8, 2015, the parties scheduled a July 30, 2015, meeting to explore settlement opportunities.
The parties respectfully request that this Court continue all dates in this matter by approximately ninety (90) days so as to allow the parties the opportunity to focus on resolution rather than litigating. Therefore, the parties stipulate to, and propose the following briefing schedule:
Event Current Date Proposed Date
Objections to Administrative Record June 22, 2015 September 28, 2015
Plaintiff's Motion June 29, 2015 October 5, 2015
Defendants' Opposition and July 31, 2015 November 4, 2015
Cross-motion
Plaintiff's Combined Opposition and August 14, 2015 November 18, 2015
Reply
Defendants' Reply August 31, 2015 December 2, 2015
DATED: June 24, 2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
By: /s/Gregory T. Broderick
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorney
Good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
