Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union International, 2:18-CV-00959-JCM-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180917645 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST CLARIFIED NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs, and Defendants Amalgamated Transit Union International, James Lindsay III, Lawrence J. Hanley, Antonette Bryant, Richie Murphy, Keira McNett, Daniel Smith, and Tyler Home ("ATU Defendants"); Keolis Transit America Inc. and Kelvin Manzanares ("Keolis Defendants"); and Miller Kaplan & Arase, Anne Salvador, and Alexandra Chernyak ("MKA Defendants
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST CLARIFIED

Plaintiffs, and Defendants Amalgamated Transit Union International, James Lindsay III, Lawrence J. Hanley, Antonette Bryant, Richie Murphy, Keira McNett, Daniel Smith, and Tyler Home ("ATU Defendants"); Keolis Transit America Inc. and Kelvin Manzanares ("Keolis Defendants"); and Miller Kaplan & Arase, Anne Salvador, and Alexandra Chernyak ("MKA Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that all Parties intended, by filing ECF No. 15 (First Stipulation for Extension of Time), to extend all Defendants' deadlines for responsive pleadings until September 25, 2018. The parties acknowledge that there may have been some ambiguity in how the First Stipulation for Extension of Time, which the Court ordered at ECF No. 16, was worded, because the ATU Defendants waived service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) and were not personally served with process. Accordingly, the Parties now stipulate that all Defendants, regardless of whether they were personally served or waived service of process, have until September 25, 2018, to file their responsive pleadings to the Amended Complaint.

This is a clarification of the parties' first stipulation for extension of time to file responsive pleadings to the Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer