Cook v. Whitley, 4:16-cv-00693-KGB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180522538
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 21, 2018
Latest Update: May 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff James Ryan Cook's motion to dismiss without prejudice (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Cook seeks to dismiss his claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Defendant Gene Whitley, individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the City of North Little Rock, Arkansas, has not responded to Mr. Cook's motion. For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Cook's claims are dismissed withou
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Before the Court is plaintiff James Ryan Cook's motion to dismiss without prejudice (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Cook seeks to dismiss his claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Defendant Gene Whitley, individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the City of North Little Rock, Arkansas, has not responded to Mr. Cook's motion. For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Cook's claims are dismissed without..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff James Ryan Cook's motion to dismiss without prejudice (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Cook seeks to dismiss his claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Defendant Gene Whitley, individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the City of North Little Rock, Arkansas, has not responded to Mr. Cook's motion. For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Dkt. No. 20). Mr. Cook's claims are dismissed without prejudice with each party to bear his own costs and fees.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
