MOSS v. U.S., 12-CV-4030. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150401c15
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Because the Court authorized the parties to engage in limited discovery regarding jurisdictional issues raised in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31), the Court set a deadline of April 15, 2015, for Plaintiffs to file a response to the motion. Defendant's reply is due two weeks from the date that Plaintiffs file their response. Accordingly, the Court will stay consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) until after Defendant f
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Because the Court authorized the parties to engage in limited discovery regarding jurisdictional issues raised in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31), the Court set a deadline of April 15, 2015, for Plaintiffs to file a response to the motion. Defendant's reply is due two weeks from the date that Plaintiffs file their response. Accordingly, the Court will stay consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) until after Defendant fi..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Because the Court authorized the parties to engage in limited discovery regarding jurisdictional issues raised in Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31), the Court set a deadline of April 15, 2015, for Plaintiffs to file a response to the motion. Defendant's reply is due two weeks from the date that Plaintiffs file their response. Accordingly, the Court will stay consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) until after Defendant files its reply to Plaintiffs' response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
