Dunn v. Colvin, 2:15-cv-2007-MEF. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160518739
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 17, 2016
Latest Update: May 17, 2016
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT MARK E. FORD , Magistrate Judge . This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff's complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT MARK E. FORD , Magistrate Judge . This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff's complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the E..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
MARK E. FORD, Magistrate Judge.
This cause is before the court on the Plaintiff's complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The court, having reviewed the record, the administrative transcript, the briefs of the parties, the applicable law, and having heard oral argument, finds as follows, to-wit:
For the reasons announced by the court on the record at the conclusion of the parties' oral argument on May 13, 2016, the court finds that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is supported by substantial evidence, and the same is hereby affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
