ESCALANTE v. ASTRUE, 2:12-CV-02024. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120510833
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 09, 2012
Latest Update: May 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 9) filed in this case on March 5, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge. Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 9) filed in this case on March 5, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be a..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 9) filed in this case on March 5, 2012, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations, Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 2) and Amended Motion (Doc. 5) to proceed in forma pauperis are DENIED, and Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing fee of $350.00 by June 8, 2012. Should Plaintiff fail to comply by that deadline, his Complaint may be dismissed for failure to obey a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
