Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ODOM v. JIMMY BANKS, 5:11-cv-260-DPM. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20120409785 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The parties jointly moved to dismiss this case with prejudice, informing United States Magistrate Judge Young that the parties had reached a compromise. Document No. 59. Judge Young then entered his proposed findings and recommendations that the case should be dismissed with prejudice per the parties' compromise. Document No. 60. Odom did not object. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72
More

ORDER

D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.

The parties jointly moved to dismiss this case with prejudice, informing United States Magistrate Judge Young that the parties had reached a compromise. Document No. 59. Judge Young then entered his proposed findings and recommendations that the case should be dismissed with prejudice per the parties' compromise. Document No. 60. Odom did not object. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts Judge Young's proposed findings and recommendations as its own. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). And the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this dismissal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith.

The Court dismisses adorn's complaint, Document No. 2, with prejudice and denies as moot adorn's pending motion for partial summary judgment, Document No. 48.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer