Washington v. Lopez, 4:18-CV-00625 BSM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20181210945
Visitors: 32
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , Chief District Judge . The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe [Doc. No. 21] have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety, and this case is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), that an in fo
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , Chief District Judge . The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe [Doc. No. 21] have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety, and this case is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), that an in for..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe [Doc. No. 21] have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendations are adopted in their entirety, and this case is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
