Murphy v. United States Forest Service, 13-cv-02315-TLN-AC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160225943
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2016
Summary: REVISED AND SUPERSEDING STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties have continued attempts at resolution and are down to two key terms, and request a continuance in the hearing date and briefing schedule regarding the pending motion for summary judgment so that they may continue to attempt resolution. This stipulation and proposed order supersedes and is meant to replace the stipulation and proposed order lodged Frid
Summary: REVISED AND SUPERSEDING STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties have continued attempts at resolution and are down to two key terms, and request a continuance in the hearing date and briefing schedule regarding the pending motion for summary judgment so that they may continue to attempt resolution. This stipulation and proposed order supersedes and is meant to replace the stipulation and proposed order lodged Frida..
More
REVISED AND SUPERSEDING STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
The parties have continued attempts at resolution and are down to two key terms, and request a continuance in the hearing date and briefing schedule regarding the pending motion for summary judgment so that they may continue to attempt resolution. This stipulation and proposed order supersedes and is meant to replace the stipulation and proposed order lodged Friday, February 19, 2016, and reflects further communications of the parties today. Thus, the parties hereby stipulate to, and seek an order from this Court, continuing the briefing schedule as follows.
Event Current Date Proposed Date
Defendants' Opposition and February 22, 2016 March 8, 2016
Cross-Motion
Plaintiff's Reply and Opposition March 21, 2016 April 4, 2016
Defendants' Reply April 1, 2016 April 14, 2016
The parties also stipulate to, and propose continuing the current hearing date of April 7, 2016, at 2 p.m., to April 21, 2016, at 2 p.m.
The parties further note that the Forest Service halted the Project some time ago (though there is a dispute regarding the ongoing environmental impacts of previously implemented Project actions) and authorization for the challenged Project has been withdrawn. There is thus good cause for the continuance, and the Court should grant it. Respectfully submitted,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
