Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

City of Monticello v. Siemens Industry, Inc., 5:15-cv-127-DPM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20160525926 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . Motion, No 117, granted. The parties may file one joint report on the disputed privilege issues. Neither side may exceed fifteen pages. The Court requests that Siemens take three further steps: redo the privilege log so that the headings appear on every page; file copies of all the disputed documents ex parte and under seal with the joint report; and provide a paper copy of the disputed documents to chambers. So Ordered.

ORDER

Motion, No 117, granted. The parties may file one joint report on the disputed privilege issues. Neither side may exceed fifteen pages. The Court requests that Siemens take three further steps: redo the privilege log so that the headings appear on every page; file copies of all the disputed documents ex parte and under seal with the joint report; and provide a paper copy of the disputed documents to chambers.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer