OSBORN v. BARTOS, CV-08-2193-PHX-ROS (JRI). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20120207792
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 280). A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. ; see also United States v. Reyn
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 280). A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id. ; see also United States v. Reyna..
More
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 280).
A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party has filed timely objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendations, the district court's review of the part objected to is to be de novo. Id.; see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) ("Following Reyna-Tapia, this Court concludes that de novo review of factual and legal issues is required if objections are made, but not otherwise.") (internal quotations and citations omitted).
The R&R was issued January 12, 2012. No objections being made, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in full.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 280) is ADOPTED.
IT IS ORDERED Defendants Unknown Parties (John Does and Jane Does) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
