Baker v. Ervin, 2:17-CV-02136. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180830957
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. 31) to dismiss his case without prejudice. Counsel for Separate Defendants Austin Ervin and Bill Hollenbeck has filed a formal response stating his clients do not object to dismissal without prejudice, and Counsel for Separate Defendants Brandon Davis and William C. Dawson has informed the Court by phone that her clients also do not object to dismissal without prejudice. The Court considers dismissal on thes
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. 31) to dismiss his case without prejudice. Counsel for Separate Defendants Austin Ervin and Bill Hollenbeck has filed a formal response stating his clients do not object to dismissal without prejudice, and Counsel for Separate Defendants Brandon Davis and William C. Dawson has informed the Court by phone that her clients also do not object to dismissal without prejudice. The Court considers dismissal on these..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. 31) to dismiss his case without prejudice. Counsel for Separate Defendants Austin Ervin and Bill Hollenbeck has filed a formal response stating his clients do not object to dismissal without prejudice, and Counsel for Separate Defendants Brandon Davis and William C. Dawson has informed the Court by phone that her clients also do not object to dismissal without prejudice. The Court considers dismissal on these terms proper.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 31) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
