Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Huerta, 1:18-mj-00101. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181004e25 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . BACKGROUND Defendants Huerta and Corral made an initial appearance on June 29, 2018 pursuant to a summons issued in conjunction with a Criminal Complaint. On that date, the United States provided initial, voluntary discovery to the counsel for defendant. The parties are exploring whether a potential pre-indictment resolution is desirable, and the parties have made significant progress in that dire
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING

BACKGROUND

Defendants Huerta and Corral made an initial appearance on June 29, 2018 pursuant to a summons issued in conjunction with a Criminal Complaint. On that date, the United States provided initial, voluntary discovery to the counsel for defendant. The parties are exploring whether a potential pre-indictment resolution is desirable, and the parties have made significant progress in that direction. However, the parties are requesting some additional time to finalize resolution or proceed forward.

This matter is currently scheduled for a preliminary hearing on October 4, 2018. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(c) requires that preliminary hearing occur within twenty-one days, but Rule 5.1(d) also provides that the time limits may be extended "one or more times" with the defendant's consent and a showing of good cause. Here, the parties agree that there is good cause for the further extension, as the parties have made substantial efforts in negotiating a pre-indictment resolution. The parties believe that with one final additional continuance, they will be able to adequately prepare, consult with defendants, and proceed with resolution or presentation of the matter to a grand jury. The parties request that a preliminary hearing be re-set for November 26, 2018.

The parties also agree that time should be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b), which requires an indictment within 30 days of a defendant's arrest or service of a summons, for defense preparation, plea negotiation, and continuity of counsel.

STIPULATION AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys, that the preliminary hearing currently set for October 4, 2018 be continued to November 26, 2018. The parties agree to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act from October 4, 2018 to November 26, 2018, because the interest of the public and of the defendant in a public indictment and trial are outweighed by the need for defense preparation, plea negotiation, and continuity of counsel.

ORDER

The preliminary hearing currently set for October 4, 2018 is continued to November 26, 2018 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The period from October 4, 2018 to November 26, 2018 shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds that the interest of the public and of the defendant in a public indictment and trial are outweighed by the need for defense preparation, plea negotiation, and continuity of counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer