JAMES v. BALL, 2:11CV00161 BSM/JTR. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120518557
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 17, 2012
Latest Update: May 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering this document and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Separate def
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering this document and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Separate defe..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering this document and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Separate defendant Kelley's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 31] is granted, and she is dismissed without prejudice from this action.
2. It is hereby certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
