JORDAN v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, 2:16-CV-2104. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20170223a82
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Currently before the Court is the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 25). Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds it is well taken . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims Plaintiffs Charles and JoAnn Jordan asserted or could have asserted against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party bearing its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' f
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS , District Judge . Currently before the Court is the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 25). Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds it is well taken . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims Plaintiffs Charles and JoAnn Jordan asserted or could have asserted against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party bearing its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fe..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 25). Having considered the Stipulation, the Court finds it is well taken . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims Plaintiffs Charles and JoAnn Jordan asserted or could have asserted against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party bearing its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
