U.S. v. George, 1:03-CR-05453-LJO. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190425859
Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE (ECF No. 509) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The Court has received and reviewed the Defendant's Motion to Terminate Remaining Supervised Release Term Per 18 U.S.C. 3583(e)(2). ECF No. 509. The Court has also received and reviewed the opposition by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the opposition by the Probation Officer. ECF No. 511. It appears clear that the Defendant has been in contact with his co-defendant
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE (ECF No. 509) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . The Court has received and reviewed the Defendant's Motion to Terminate Remaining Supervised Release Term Per 18 U.S.C. 3583(e)(2). ECF No. 509. The Court has also received and reviewed the opposition by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the opposition by the Probation Officer. ECF No. 511. It appears clear that the Defendant has been in contact with his co-defendant d..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE (ECF No. 509)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
The Court has received and reviewed the Defendant's Motion to Terminate Remaining Supervised Release Term Per 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2). ECF No. 509. The Court has also received and reviewed the opposition by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the opposition by the Probation Officer. ECF No. 511.
It appears clear that the Defendant has been in contact with his co-defendant during the time after the Defendant was released from prison, and while the co-defendant remained in prison. This is a violation of the terms of Supervised Release and contradicts the Defendant's representation of total compliance.
The motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
