Oellrich v. City of Pleasanton, 18-cv-02574-SK. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181220992
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 16 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered o
Summary: ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 16 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered ov..
More
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 16
SALLIE KIM, Magistrate Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If ninety days pass without notification of failure to deliver the settlement, the action will be deemed dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
