Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jonathan David Duke, 08-15190 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 08-15190 Visitors: 56
Filed: Jul. 01, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 1, 2009 No. 08-15190 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00065-CR-4-RH/WCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN DAVID DUKE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 1, 2009) Before BLACK, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michae
More
                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]


              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                    FILED
                      FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                        ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             JULY 1, 2009
                              No. 08-15190                 THOMAS K. KAHN
                          Non-Argument Calendar                CLERK
                        ________________________

                 D. C. Docket No. 07-00065-CR-4-RH/WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

JONATHAN DAVID DUKE,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.


                        ________________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                     for the Northern District of Florida
                       _________________________

                                (July 1, 2009)

Before BLACK, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

     Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Jonathan David Duke in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
,

87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Duke’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer