Filed: Oct. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. Plaintiff has filed objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety and in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. Plaintiff has filed objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety and in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The ..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received. Plaintiff has filed objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety and in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Mark Cashion, Larry May, Emmett Patrick, and Loretha West [Doc. No. 34] is granted, and plaintiff's claims against Cashion, May, Patrick, and West are dismissed with prejudice.
2. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Judith Savoy [Doc. No. 38] is granted, and plaintiff's claims against Savoy are dismissed without prejudice.
3. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice with respect to his claims against Savoy, and dismissed with prejudice in all other respects.
4. The court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
