FRATUS v. CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 1:12-cv-00906-LJO-SKO (PC). (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150410985
Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER (1) VACATING ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO STATUS REPORT AND (2) REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 58 and 60) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On April 8, 2015, Plaintiff John Fratus filed a status report notifying the Court that he now has all of his property. Accordingly, the order directing Defendants Callow and Beard to respond to Plaintiff's prior status report regarding his missing property boxes, filed on April 8, 2015, is VACATED
Summary: ORDER (1) VACATING ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO STATUS REPORT AND (2) REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY WITHIN THIRTY DAYS (Doc. 58 and 60) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On April 8, 2015, Plaintiff John Fratus filed a status report notifying the Court that he now has all of his property. Accordingly, the order directing Defendants Callow and Beard to respond to Plaintiff's prior status report regarding his missing property boxes, filed on April 8, 2015, is VACATED,..
More
ORDER (1) VACATING ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO STATUS REPORT AND (2) REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE REPLY WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
(Doc. 58 and 60)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
On April 8, 2015, Plaintiff John Fratus filed a status report notifying the Court that he now has all of his property. Accordingly, the order directing Defendants Callow and Beard to respond to Plaintiff's prior status report regarding his missing property boxes, filed on April 8, 2015, is VACATED, and Plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order within which to file his reply to Defendants' opposition to his motion for summary judgment.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Docs. 38, 53.
Source: Leagle
