NEWTON v. MIXON, 2:13CV00116 JLH/BD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140715658
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jul. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 14, 2014
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge. The Defendants have moved to strike Mr. Newton's summary judgment motion from the record. (Docket entry #29) They argue that Mr. Newton's motion is untimely, that he failed to timely respond to their summary judgment motion, and that they should not be required to respond to Mr. Newton's motion. The motion (#29) is GRANTED, in part. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Mr. Newton's motion as a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge. The Defendants have moved to strike Mr. Newton's summary judgment motion from the record. (Docket entry #29) They argue that Mr. Newton's motion is untimely, that he failed to timely respond to their summary judgment motion, and that they should not be required to respond to Mr. Newton's motion. The motion (#29) is GRANTED, in part. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Mr. Newton's motion as a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The ..
More
ORDER
BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge.
The Defendants have moved to strike Mr. Newton's summary judgment motion from the record. (Docket entry #29) They argue that Mr. Newton's motion is untimely, that he failed to timely respond to their summary judgment motion, and that they should not be required to respond to Mr. Newton's motion. The motion (#29) is GRANTED, in part. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Mr. Newton's motion as a response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Defendants are not required to reply to Mr. Newton's response.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
