Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CRUZ, 1:14-CR-00048 LJO SKO. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140609602 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. The parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Electronic surveillance was conducted in connection with the investigation in this case No. 1:14-CR-00048 LJO SKO. Accordingly, numerous documents were filed with the Court, under seal, relating to the electronic surveillance. 2. Persons who have not been charged in any criminal conduct, but who were iden
More

STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

The parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Electronic surveillance was conducted in connection with the investigation in this case No. 1:14-CR-00048 LJO SKO. Accordingly, numerous documents were filed with the Court, under seal, relating to the electronic surveillance.

2. Persons who have not been charged in any criminal conduct, but who were identified in the documents filed with the court regarding the electronic surveillance and/or whose communications were intercepted have privacy interests.

3. The government has discovery obligations to the defendants with regard to documents filed with the Court and the intercepted communications.

4. Disclosure by the government will implicate the privacy interest of the persons mentioned in paragraph 2 above.

5. Therefore, the parties and defense counsel, including but not limited to defense counsels staff, investigators, and outside assistants, shall not disclose the contents of the documents released by the government through discovery except as necessary for investigative work for the prosecution or for the presentation of defenses in this case.

6. The documents filed with the Court in connection with the electronic surveillance in this case shall remain sealed form the general public.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The United States Attorney may provide as discovery in this case all court documents filed in connection with the electronic surveillance the intercepted communications themselves.

2. The parties and defense counsel, including but not limited to defense counsel=s staff, investigators, and outside assistants, shall not disclose the contents of the documents release by the government through discovery except as necessary for investigative work for the prosecution or presentation of defenses in this case.

3. The documents filed with the Court in connection with the electronic surveillance in this case shall remain sealed from the general public.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer