Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Hemsley, 2:13-CR-00300 GEB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171024h40 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney, through Samuel Wong and Gregory T. Broderick, Assistant United States Attorneys attorney for Plaintiff, on the one hand, and Heather E. Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defenders Sean Riordan and Matthew C. Bockmon, attorneys for defendant Russell E. Gilmore, as wel
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney, through Samuel Wong and Gregory T. Broderick, Assistant United States Attorneys attorney for Plaintiff, on the one hand, and Heather E. Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defenders Sean Riordan and Matthew C. Bockmon, attorneys for defendant Russell E. Gilmore, as well as David Fischer, attorney for defendant Richard D. Hemsley, on the other hand, that the status conference and hearing on Hemsley's motion for review of detention order scheduled for October 20, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. be continued to October 27. 2017, at 9:00 a.m.

The government filed an opposition to defendant Hemsley's motion to review the detention order. The continuance is appropriate because counsel for defendant Richard Hemsley needs additional time to consult with his client before the hearing on the motion.

Time is currently excluded under the Speedy Trial Act based on defendants' appeal to the Ninth Circuit from this Court's order denying both defendants' request for a preliminary injunction based on the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. McIntosh, 833 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2016). (Dkt. No. 290). Mr. Gilmore is currently out of custody and his pretrial supervision has been terminated. (Dkt. No. 331). Mr. Hemsley is currently in custody. (Dkt. No. 338).

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the Court should find and order: (1) the failure to grant the requested continuance would deny counsel for defendants reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence; (2) in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act within which the trial of this matter must be commenced, time should be excluded from the date of this stipulation, October 19, 2017, through and including the October 27, 2017, hearing date pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(C) [delay resulting from interlocutory appeals], Local Code D, as well as 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon and defense preparation; and (3) the ends of justice served by taking such action in granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court having received, read, and considered the stipulation between the United States of America and defendant Russell Gilmore, and defendant Richard Hemsley, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation and proposed findings in their entirety as its Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer