Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

OTEY v. CROWDFLOWER, INC., 3:12-cv-05524-JST/MEJ. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130930e13 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF LITIGATION ACTIVITIES PENDING, MEDIATION [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY and MARY GRETH ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD, and CHRIS VAN PELT ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby enter into the following Stipulation Regarding Continuation of Litigation Activities Pending Mediation. Specifically, by and through this Stipulation, the parties request that the Court
More

STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF LITIGATION ACTIVITIES PENDING, MEDIATION

[PROPOSED] ORDER

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.

Plaintiffs CHRISTOPHER OTEY and MARY GRETH ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants CROWDFLOWER, INC., LUKAS BIEWALD, and CHRIS VAN PELT ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby enter into the following Stipulation Regarding Continuation of Litigation Activities Pending Mediation. Specifically, by and through this Stipulation, the parties request that the Court grant the parties leave to continue all litigation activities, including responses to pending discovery requests, pending the parties' mediation scheduled for October 18 and 19, 2013.

STIPULATION

1. The original Complaint in this action was filed on October 26, 2012 against Defendants Crowdflower, Inc., Lukas Biewald and Chris Van Pelt.

2. No case management conference has yet occurred and the Court has not yet issued any scheduling order.

3. The initial case management conference is scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on December 11, 2013.

4. The parties have scheduled mediation on October 18 and 19, 2013.

5. The parties desire to preserve substantial time, effort and expense pending mediation.

6. The parties further desire to devote any efforts related to this litigation prior to October 18, 2013 to preparation for the upcoming mediation.

7. Such continuance will help facilitate a successful mediation.

8. If settlement is not achieved through mediation on October 18 and 19, 2013, the continuance sought will not materially delay or alter the progress of this litigation.

WHEREFORE, the parties mutually request that the Court enter the proposed Order below, thereby continuing the deadlines for all litigation activities, including response to pending discovery requests, up to and including October 31, 2013.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Good cause appearing therefore, the foregoing Stipulation Re: Continuation of Litigation Activities Pending Mediation ("Stipulation") is hereby approved and it is hereby ordered that:

All litigation activities, including responses to pending discovery requests, are continued up to and including October 31, 2013.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer