ADKINS v. YORK, 5:13CV00160 BSM. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130826440
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2013
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe, addressing Mr. Adkins's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted with respect to defendants Iko and Peters, has been reviewed, along with the filed objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and ado
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe, addressing Mr. Adkins's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted with respect to defendants Iko and Peters, has been reviewed, along with the filed objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adop..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe, addressing Mr. Adkins's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted with respect to defendants Iko and Peters, has been reviewed, along with the filed objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in all respects.
Accordingly, defendants Iko and Peters are dismissed due to Mr. Adkins's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
