CATALINA LONDON LIMITED v. JEANNE ESTATES APARTMENTS, INC., 11-CV-4091. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150401c13
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 106) filed on behalf of Defendant Cherry Hill Printing Company, Inc. Plaintiff Catalina London Limited f/k/a Alea London Limited ("Catalina") has filed a response. (ECF No. 107). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. Cherry Hill Printing moves to dismiss Catalina's action for declaratory judgment as to the underlying case Kolbek, et al. v. Twenty-First Century Holiness Tabernacle Church,
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 106) filed on behalf of Defendant Cherry Hill Printing Company, Inc. Plaintiff Catalina London Limited f/k/a Alea London Limited ("Catalina") has filed a response. (ECF No. 107). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration. Cherry Hill Printing moves to dismiss Catalina's action for declaratory judgment as to the underlying case Kolbek, et al. v. Twenty-First Century Holiness Tabernacle Church, ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 106) filed on behalf of Defendant Cherry Hill Printing Company, Inc. Plaintiff Catalina London Limited f/k/a Alea London Limited ("Catalina") has filed a response. (ECF No. 107). The Court finds this matter ripe for consideration.
Cherry Hill Printing moves to dismiss Catalina's action for declaratory judgment as to the underlying case Kolbek, et al. v. Twenty-First Century Holiness Tabernacle Church, Inc. et al., Case No. 4:10-cv-04124. Cherry Hill Printing argues that, because it was dismissed from the Kolbek suit, there is no remaining controversy between the parties as to the Kolbek suit. In response to the motion, Catalina points out that it has already stated on the record that it is no longer seeking a declaratory judgment as to Cherry Hill Printing with respect to the Kolbek action. (ECF No. 105, p. 3). Accordingly, the Court finds that the motion (ECF No. 106) should be and hereby is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
