JAMES v. DUNCAN, 3:15-CV-00080 DPM/BD. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151015741
Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . Separate Defendants Bentley, Jackson, and Reece have moved for an order compelling Mr. James to respond to their discovery requests. (Docket entry #20) The motion (#20) is GRANTED. Mr. James has until November 12, 2015, to respond to the discovery requests at issue. If he fails to comply with this order, he risks having some or all of his claims dismissed, without prejudice. See Local Rule 5.5. Mr. James has moved for court-appointed counsel. (#21) Th
Summary: ORDER BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . Separate Defendants Bentley, Jackson, and Reece have moved for an order compelling Mr. James to respond to their discovery requests. (Docket entry #20) The motion (#20) is GRANTED. Mr. James has until November 12, 2015, to respond to the discovery requests at issue. If he fails to comply with this order, he risks having some or all of his claims dismissed, without prejudice. See Local Rule 5.5. Mr. James has moved for court-appointed counsel. (#21) Tha..
More
ORDER
BETH DEERE, Magistrate Judge.
Separate Defendants Bentley, Jackson, and Reece have moved for an order compelling Mr. James to respond to their discovery requests. (Docket entry #20) The motion (#20) is GRANTED.
Mr. James has until November 12, 2015, to respond to the discovery requests at issue. If he fails to comply with this order, he risks having some or all of his claims dismissed, without prejudice. See Local Rule 5.5.
Mr. James has moved for court-appointed counsel. (#21) That motion is DENIED for reasons explained in a previous order (#2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
